banner



Intel Iris Plus Graphics Vs Nvidia

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 six GB vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

Price at present 569$

Games supported 96%

Price now 669$

Games supported 62%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for coin and other general parameters.

Identify in performance rating 132 573
Value for money 13.62 1.26
Architecture Pascal (2016−2021) Gen. 9.five Kaby Lake (2015−2017)
GPU code name GP106 Kaby Lake GT3e
Market segment Desktop Laptop
Release date 19 July 2016 (half-dozen years agone) three Jan 2017 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP) $299 no information
Electric current price $569 (1.9x MSRP) $669

Value for coin

To become the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

Technical specs

General operation parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and adding speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their criterion and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores 1280 48
Core clock speed 1506 MHz 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1708 MHz 1050 MHz
Number of transistors four,400 one thousand thousand 189 million
Manufacturing procedure technology 16 nm 14 nm
Thermal blueprint power (TDP) 120 Watt 15 Watt
Texture fill charge per unit 136.7 52.80
Floating-point functioning 4,375 gflops no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce GTX 1060 half dozen GB and Iris Plus Graphics 640 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a hereafter computer configuration or upgrading an existing 1. For desktop video cards information technology'southward interface and double-decker (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe iii.0 x1
Length 250 mm no data
Width 2-slot no data
Supplementary ability connectors 1x vi-pin no data

Memory

Parameters of retention installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared function of organization RAM.

Memory type GDDR5 DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM corporeality 6 GB 32 GB
Memory bus width 192 Bit 64/128 Flake
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz System Shared
Memory bandwidth 192.2 GB/southward no information
Shared memory - +

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, information in this department is precise but for desktop reference ones (and then-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the menu itself.

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort No outputs
HDMI + no data
1000-SYNC back up + no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will testify useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready + no information
Quick Sync no information +

API back up

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_1)
Shader Model half-dozen.four 6.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL i.2 2.1
Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.103
CUDA 6.one no data

Benchmark functioning

Non-gaming criterion performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. Nosotros are regularly improving our combining algorithms, only if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel gratis to speak up in comments section, we normally fix problems quickly.

GTX 1060 6 GB 34.74

+588%

Iris Plus Graphics 640 5.05

  • Passmark
  • 3DMark 11 Functioning GPU
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Burn Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, function of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics menu a thorough evaluation under various load, providing 4 separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, x, 11 and 12 (the last existence done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Criterion coverage: 25%

GTX 1060 6 GB 10252

+589%

Iris Plus Graphics 640 1489

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 criterion past Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one existence few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark eleven is now superseded by Time Spy.

Criterion coverage: 17%

GTX 1060 half dozen GB 17288

+627%

Iris Plus Graphics 640 2379

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 characteristic level x benchmark that was used for habitation PCs and basic notebooks. Information technology displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using stock-still resolution of 1280x720. Just similar Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: xiv%

GTX 1060 6 GB 76477

+580%

Iris Plus Graphics 640 11248

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1060 6 GB 11039

+743%

Iris Plus Graphics 640 1310

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two split up tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic plenty graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: xiv%

GTX 1060 6 GB 12816

+820%

Iris Plus Graphics 640 1394

Water ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to mensurate entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets functioning. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle betwixt 2 space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in Jan 2020, it is now superseded past 3DMark Nighttime Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GTX 1060 half-dozen GB 235179

+61.7%

Iris Plus Graphics 640 145481

Gaming functioning

Let'due south see how adept the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large gear up of popular games across different resolutions:

Total HD 93 21
1440p 49 no data
4K 32 no information
  • Total HD
    Low Preset
  • Full Hd
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    Loftier Preset
  • Full Hard disk drive
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 72

+1340%

five−6

−1340%

Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla 35−forty

+600%

5−6

−600%

Battlefield 5 106

+2020%

5−6

−2020%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 78

+1460%

five−6

−1460%

Cyberpunk 2077 35−xl

+600%

5−half-dozen

−600%

Far Weep five 82

+1540%

five−6

−1540%

Far Weep New Dawn 81

+1520%

5−vi

−1520%

Forza Horizon 4 100

+1900%

5−6

−1900%

Hitman 3 35−twoscore

+600%

v−half dozen

−600%

Horizon Cipher Dawn 35−twoscore

+600%

5−vi

−600%

Red Expressionless Redemption two 56

+1020%

five−6

−1020%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 68

+1260%

5−6

−1260%

Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40

+600%

5−half dozen

−600%

Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey 61

+1120%

5−half-dozen

−1120%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40

+600%

5−six

−600%

Battlefield v 86

+1620%

5−vi

−1620%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 64

+1180%

v−6

−1180%

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40

+600%

v−6

−600%

Far Cry 5 75

+1400%

five−six

−1400%

Far Cry New Dawn 75

+1400%

v−6

−1400%

Forza Horizon 4 93

+1760%

5−6

−1760%

Hitman 3 35−40

+600%

5−6

−600%

Horizon Goose egg Dawn 35−40

+600%

5−6

−600%

Metro Exodus 43

+760%

5−6

−760%

Reddish Expressionless Redemption two 30

+500%

v−six

−500%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58

+1060%

5−6

−1060%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76

+1420%

5−6

−1420%

Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40

+600%

5−6

−600%

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 38

+660%

five−vi

−660%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−twoscore

+600%

5−six

−600%

Battlefield 5 78

+1460%

5−half-dozen

−1460%

Cyberpunk 2077 35−twoscore

+600%

5−6

−600%

Far Cry 5 70

+1300%

5−6

−1300%

Far Cry New Dawn 69

+1280%

5−6

−1280%

Forza Horizon 4 73

+1360%

five−vi

−1360%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44

+chiliad%

4

−1000%

Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40

+600%

5−6

−600%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 41

+720%

5−6

−720%

Hitman 3 35−twoscore

+600%

5−6

−600%

Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40

+600%

5−6

−600%

Metro Exodus 26

+420%

5−six

−420%

Red Dead Redemption two 19

+280%

5−half dozen

−280%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 34

+580%

5−6

−580%

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 32

+540%

5−6

−540%

Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla 35−xl

+600%

5−half dozen

−600%

Battlefield 5 58

+1060%

5−6

−1060%

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40

+600%

5−6

−600%

Far Weep v 47

+840%

5−vi

−840%

Far Weep New Dawn 50

+900%

five−half-dozen

−900%

Forza Horizon 4 57

+1040%

5−6

−1040%

Watch Dogs: Legion 35−twoscore

+600%

five−vi

−600%

Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 22

+340%

five−6

−340%

Hitman three 35−40

+600%

v−six

−600%

Horizon Zero Dawn 35−forty

+600%

5−half-dozen

−600%

Metro Exodus sixteen

+220%

five−six

−220%

Scarlet Dead Redemption two 12

+140%

v−half-dozen

−140%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17

+240%

five−6

−240%

The Witcher three: Wild Hunt 29

+480%

v−6

−480%

Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 18

+260%

5−half-dozen

−260%

Assassin'south Creed Valhalla 35−xl

+600%

five−6

−600%

Battlefield five 31

+520%

5−half dozen

−520%

Cyberpunk 2077 35−xl

+600%

five−6

−600%

Far Cry 5 23

+360%

5−half dozen

−360%

Far Cry New Dawn 26

+420%

5−6

−420%

Forza Horizon 4 38

+660%

five−6

−660%

Watch Dogs: Legion 35−twoscore

+600%

5−6

−600%

Advantages and disadvantages


Operation rating 34.74 5.05
Novelty 19 July 2016 3 January 2017
Memory bus width 192 64
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1280 48
Bit lithography xvi nm 14 nm
Thermal pattern ability (TDP) 120 Watt 15 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical Urban center recommends

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 vi GB

since it shows better performance.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 half-dozen GB is a desktop carte du jour while Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a notebook one.


Should y'all still take questions concerning pick betwixt the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments department, and we shall reply.

Cast your vote

Practise y'all think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Like" button nearly your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

Competitors of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB past AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB from AMD is Radeon R9 FURY X, which is slower by one% and lower past 4 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 100

Like GPU comparisons

Nosotros selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more than or less close to those reviewed, providing yous with more options to consider.

User rating

Hither you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, also equally charge per unit them yourself.


Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 half dozen GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you tin ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or written report an mistake or mismatch.


Graphics settings

Screen resolution

FPS

Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1060-6-GB-vs-Iris-Plus-Graphics-640

0 Response to "Intel Iris Plus Graphics Vs Nvidia"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel